|
mind articles
Artificial Sweeteners: Part 2
Welcome
to the second part on aspartame. After examining in part one the
history of aspartame, in what foods it is hidden, the two opposing
teams and finally the symptoms of aspartame poisoning we now dig
a little deeper into its chemistry (to review Part one see February
issue of Peak Performance).
Part two examines the science behind aspartame, as its supporters
contend it's a naturally safe product containing only compounds
that already exist in nature.
Finally I will include some alternatives.
The science behind aspartame
"Aspartame is the methyl ester of the dipeptide of the natural
amino acids L-aspartic acid and L-phenylalanine. Under strongly-acidic
or -alkaline conditions, aspartame first generates methanol by hydrolysis.
Under more severe conditions, the peptide bonds are also hydrolyzed,
resulting in the free amino acids".(5) Got that?
There are four chemical components of aspartame that scientists
and physicians are currently debating over that may be causing or
adversely effecting people's health (5):
1. Methanol
Scientists agree that approximately 10% of aspartame (by weight)
is broken down into methanol in the small intestine. Now most of
that methanol is absorbed and quickly converted into formaldehyde
(yes, the embalming substance).
Some scientists believe that the methanol can not be a problem because:
a) the level of methanol absorbed is too low to cause toxicity
b) methanol and formaldehyde are already in the body as a
by-product of human metabolism
c) many alcoholic beverages and fruit juices contain more
methanol than is derived from aspartame ingestion
2. Phenylalanine
About 50% of aspartame (by weight) is broken down into phenylalanine,
which actually is an amino acid commonly found in foods. But because
aspartame is metabolized and absorbed very quickly (unlike phenylalanine-containing
proteins in foods), it is thought that aspartame could spike blood
plasma levels of phenylalanine. The concern is that this could have
a neurotoxic effect particularly in the brain of fetuses by the
sudden influx of phenylalanine into the bloodstream because phenylalanine
competes with other Large Neutral Amino Acids (LNAAs) for entry
into the brain at the blood brain barrier.
3. Aspartic acid
Aspartic acid is another amino acid commonly found in foods. Around
40% of aspartame (by mass) is broken down into aspartic acid. Aspartic
acid is known chemically as an excitotoxin, another famous example
is monosodium glutamate (MSG). Hundreds of animals studies involving
abnormally high levels of excitotoxins have been shown to cause
damage to areas of the brain unprotected by the blood-brain barrier
and a variety of chronic diseases arising out of this neurotoxicity.
In 1970's, Dr. John Olney found that high levels of aspartic acid
caused damage to the brains of infant mice. Which led to Dr. Olney
and consumer attorney, James Turner, filing a protest with the FDA
to block the approval of aspartame.
4. Aspartylphenylalanine diketopiperazine (DKP)
This substance is created as aspartame breaks down over time. One
group of researchers found that - 6 months after aspartame was put
into carbonated beverages - 25% of the aspartame had been converted
to DKP. Concern amongst some scientists has been expressed that
this form of DKP would undergo a nitrosation process in the stomach
producing a type of chemical that could cause brain tumors. However
there are very few human studies on the effects of this.
So what are the alternatives to this alternative (interesting
concept)?
Raw honey is an obvious choice (but avoid heating honey as it can
become a carcinogen).
Another natural product is called stevia that comes from a herb.
It has been used for centuries by traditional South American cultures
and is very popular in Japan. You can generally find it in health
food stores in liquid or powder form.
Conclusion
So where does this leave us with so many 'experts' on either side
of the fence?
My first question with any product when considering its safety
is: is it man made?
If so, has it been consumed for a long time (10,000 years)?
In this case the answer is clearly no.
Which leads me to my final question, is it worth the risk?
Your 3d Coach
Craig
Burton
References
(1) Safety of artificial sweetener called into question by
MP Felicity Lawrence, December
15, 2005, The Guardian,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/food/Story/0,,1667771,00.html
(2) Aspartame Information Sevice, http://www.aspartame.info
(3) http://www.mercola.com/article/aspartame/
government_cover_up.htm
(4) News with views,
http://www.newswithviews.com/BreakingNews/breaking25.htm
(5) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspartame
back
|